Jambudveep's Blog

January 8, 2011

An Explanatory note on the Famines in India

Filed under: British Misrule — Yogeshwar Shastri @ 6:53 pm
Tags: , , , , , ,

An Explanatory note on the Famines in India

Note: A pdf version of the article can be downloadedhere: An Explanatory note on the Famines in India.

From 1760 CE   till 1943 India was hit by terrible famines on a regular basis. More than 85 million Indians died in these famines which were in reality genocides   done by the British Raj.Contrast this to the fact that there have been no famine related deaths since independence!!

In the article below I will go over the causes and consequences of British made famines in India. I have used the words famine/genocide interchangeably as what happened in India was no different from genocide.

In the article I have tried to cover as many major points as I could, but it is inevitable that I will have missed quite a few. If brought to my attention I can add them sometime in the future.

1. What is a Famine?

Figure 1 Photograph of Famine Victims (taken from Wikipedia, year of Famine not known, possibly of the Terrible famine of 1899-1902)

A famine is defined as “A famine is a widespread scarcity of food that may apply to any faunal species. This phenomenon is usually accompanied and preceded by regional malnutrition, starvation, epidemic, and increased mortality.”[1]

It is better known in Indian languages as a अकाल (Hindi), દુકાળ (Gujarati) or as दुष्काल (Marathi).

Droughts are usually the root cause of famines. In turn droughts where there is a scarcity of life giving water for the crops, are usually the direct causes of crop failure in India. The failure of the crops in turn leads to a scarcity of food in the affected area.  Droughts are themselves usually caused by the failure of monsoons[2].

The failure of monsoons in turn is due to a periodic natural phenomenon known as ENSO (El Nino Southern Oscillation).ENSO occurs every five to seven years and causes extreme weather such as floods, droughts and other weather disturbances in many regions of the world[3]. Putting it simply, ENSO is like a natural seesaw which   causes the failure of monsoons over India while causing unnatural rainfall over the coast of South America.

So, is the process of famine in India as simple as sequential steps below?

ENSO causes monsoon failure  —> Drought —–> Crops fail—–>Famine——> Millions dead?

Are famines then a natural follow on from   the   droughts caused by ENSO?

Not at all, for the last two steps where there is a food scarcity leading to a famine and consequent deaths are completely avoidable. Even a severe drought can be stopped from developing into a killer famine by Government policies such as: banning export of food grains, rushing   adequate food supplies to the famine affected parts and ensuring equitable distribution, reducing the burden of taxation on people and in general making sure that there are enough reserves to tide through the crises. Famines always give advance notice as they are following on from droughts. With correct policy and timely government intervention   it can be ensured that there are no famine related deaths nor the immense human suffering that precedes a famine.

Post Independence though we have had quite severe droughts, some of them   even leading to famine (in Bihar in 1966-67), there have been no famine related deaths!!

Timely intervention   by the Government of India was the main reason why droughts did not lead to millions of Indians dead. It is to the great credit of the governments of Independent India that they did not let Indians perish due to starvation.

This is precisely why I have referred to   famines in British India as “British Made” (or Man  made) .Millions of lives could have been saved if the British had really been bothered about doing the right thing. Nowadays of course they hypocritically moan about the number of people “starving” in India and gleefully make crap movies like “Slumdog Millionaire” which make them feel good about themselves.

2. The Ideological Framework of Extermination

For any genocide or holocaust there is a certain ideology which drives the killing machine.eg the Islamic invaders committed horrifying massacres in India driven by the ideology of Islam, the Portuguese massacred Hindus in Goa motivated by their Christian faith and the Nazis had their fantasy about being a superior race leading to the murder of millions deemed inferior. Once the ideology provides the justification for mass murder, the methods used to achieve it are just the “tools”. e.g.  burning of Hindus at the stake for refusing to convert to Christianity would be a tool of genocide.

So accordingly the first question that we should be asking is: What was the ideology that was the driving force of the British Empire?

The straight answer to that is: Christianity. The British themselves were very clear about this; even a cursory glance at the documents of that period will make this clear. In addition there exists a multitude of books/papers which explore the synergy between missionaries spreading Christianity and the British colonization   efforts[4]. Hence from here on I will refer to the British rule in India as the Christian British Raj (CBR   for short).

The next question is: How was it possible for the Christian British oppressors to be completely devoid of any feeling towards the dead and dying Indians?

I f you consider people different to you as human beings, it is next to impossible not to be affected by their suffering. But once you start viewing them as “primitive savages” or “heathens”, similar to animals that need to be herded in a particular direction, normal feelings of humanity cease to exist.

How was this desensitisation brought about? From my limited reading it appears that two factors led to the life of the Hindu becoming worthless in his own land. I have arranged them below in order of priority; the most important factor is the first one.

1.1  The “Heathen Hindoo”

(*A Heathen is defined as an uncivilized or barbaric person[5].More commonly used in the sense of someone who does not believe in Christianity. This is a particularly insulting term used towards Hindus by Christian missionaries even today.)

The first step of dehumanising the vast Hindu population of India was to portray them as heathens or unbelievers who were immersed in the “darkness” of Hinduism. According to the missionaries it was the divine duty of the British rulers to “liberate” Hindus from Hinduism[6]. For this they had the active protection and support of the   Christian British Raj. In the doublespeak of Christianity the word “heathen” or “pagan” is equivalent to the “sub human” of the Nazis. i.e. someone whose life has little or no value unless he /she embraces Christianity.

The below  statement made by   a prominent missionary of the late 18th century and early 19th century, a person who had lived for many years in India, illustrates the general attitude towards Hinduism.

Claudius Buchanan, a chaplain attached to the East India Company, counted himself among those who had known the Hindus for a long time.  He had concluded, “Those, who have had the best opportunities of knowing them, and who have known them for the longest time, concur in declaring that neither truth, nor honesty, honour, gratitude, nor charity, is to be found pure in the breast of a Hindoo.  How can it be otherwise?  The Hindoo children have no moral instruction.  If the inhabitants of the British isles had no moral instruction, would they be moral?  The Hindoos have no moral books.  What branch of their mythology has not more of falsehood and vice in it, than of truth and virtue?  They have no moral gods.  The robber and the prostitute lift up their hands with the infant and the priest, before an horrible idol of clay painted red, deformed and disgusting as the vices which are practised before it.”[7]

Was this the ranting of a deranged mind or was this common place Christian missionary propaganda for the British masses? Vicious anti Hindu propaganda such as this was widely disseminated not only among the general public but   was fed to all British employees of the East India Company[8].In addition most of the British administrators/soldiers etc were indoctrinated at church run schools from a very early age[9].

It must be kept in mind that even till thirty-forty years back Britain was a very “Christian” country, where the church played a central role in people’s lives. Much of the negative portrayal of Hinduism in the West   today can be directly traced back to Christian missionary propaganda. Nothing has changed even in the present day as Christian missionaries continue to gather money overseas for conversion of Hindus in India.

Hence the  would be oppressors of India had already a very fixed image of Hindus and Hinduism in their minds. I would call this the primary level of ideology, where it was already decided that Hindus were “bad”.

1.2  Malthusian Mumbo Jumbo

Remember how  for a long time we were bombarded by media propaganda that “population growth is bad”?  Or that we are heading for a disaster as population grows beyond control?

All this screaming about the population explosion being dangerous was specifically directed towards India and China. Western countries   were only concerned about the “population explosion” as the ease with which they mercilessly exploit resources   would be under threat from India & China. The underlying   current   to these “concerns” is the racist fear of the “browns” (Indians), “yellow” (Chinese) and “black” (this referred to both Indians and Africans when racism could be publicly practised) would overrun “white” civilisation. Some   western authors have even made a career out of predicting millions of deaths in India and China due to famines etc!

All this propaganda about “population growth is bad” has died out a bit in recent years as a more realistic viewpoint has emerged .Turns out population growth is  not a “disaster” as was being screamed by the Western media and academics. India is especially poised to reap rich benefits from its population growth as a large segment of the population is of youth. China due to its short sighted “one child” only policy is going to face a rapidly ageing population in the coming years. Most of Europe and Japan are already heading for a demographic disaster as their population falls below replacement levels.

All this western fear of a population explosion derives from the theories proposed by   an academic nutcase by the name of Thomas Robert Malthus in the late 18th and early 19th centuries. Malthus taught History and Political Economy at the East India College at Hayleybury in Britian. And it is no surprise that Malthus was   member of the Christian clergy (a priest for short) and was inspired by “Christian principles”.

Hayleybury College can be considered to be the gutter where “well mannered” white Christian men laid out plans for the conquest and decimation of India. This college was where the future British murderers in India were trained.Some prominent  alumni of Hayleybury include  Sir John Lawrence (Viceroy of India from 1864-68),Sir Richard Temple (governot of Bombay presidency from 1877-1880).All the crazy economic and social engineering theories which led to the genocides in India were taught here. We can think of this as similar to a Nazi propaganda centre.

The basic theory as given by Malthus boils down to this[10]:

·         Population growth is bad as population would grow to an extent that the resources would no longer be enough to support it.

·         Two types of checks hold population within resource limits: positive checks, which raise the death rate; and preventative ones, which lower the birth rate.

·         The positive checks include hunger, disease and war; the preventative checks, abortion, birth control, prostitution, postponement of marriage and celibacy.

The mass murderers who went under the title of “Viceroys of India” were all pass outs from the East India College and deeply influenced by the rubbish taught there. They actually saw the massive death tolls due to famines as a “positive check” on the population of Indians!

This is illustrated in a confidential note sent by to Lord Ripon by one of his subordinates (Ripon was viceroy of India from 1880-1884 CE),

“In the words of Couper: ‘If the famine mortality in 1879 be tested, it will be found that about 80 per cent of the deaths come from the labouring classes, and nearly the whole of the remaining 20 per cent from cultivators owning such minute plots of land as to be hardly removed from labourers.’ Although they died more rapidly than any other, ‘still they reproduce themselves with sufficient rapidity to overcrowd every employment that is opened to them.’”[11]

Malthusian theories still exert tremendous influence on Western governments and intellectuals, as is evident by the constant fears of population growth expressed by them. Added to the Malthusian theories of growth were the economic theories of free trade which emphasised   minimum government interference in trade and advocated maximising profits. I haven’t read much on them at this point in time, I will add more matter once I have read enough to form a reasonable opinion.

All these theories combined to form the Secondary Level of Ideology, which basically acted as the template to justify the genocides subsequently carried out in India.

3. Tools of Genocide

In the passages below I have tried to present as many of the direct causes of the massive deaths in the British   genocides of Indians as I could gather from my limited reading.

3.1 Feed the English, Starve the Indian

In all the famines which took place under the Christian British Raj, there never was a shortage of food in the country overall .In fact during the worst famines, surplus food grains were being exported from India. Nothing illustrates this point better than the graphs below which show that records amount of rice and wheat were being exported out of India, while millions of Indians were dying of starvation. This begs the question: If taking food from the mouth of a starving man while he dies of hunger is not deliberate murder, then what is?

Example 1: The Terrible Indian Famine of 1876-79

Figure 2  Food Exports during the years 1872-1879 (source: Famines in Bengal 1770-1943,K C Ghosh,from pages 28-29)

The terrible famine of 1876-79 was spread out across nearly the whole of southern, western and northern India (Tamil Nadu, Maharashtra, Andhra Pradesh, Rajasthan, Uttar Pradesh, Karnataka, Haryana, Madhya Pradesh).The most realistic estimate of deaths is nearly 10 million. Those who survived the starvation of the famine were finished off by outbreaks of cholera.

During the famine of 1876-79 CE   rice and wheat exports continued more or less as usual. Close to a million tonnes of rice were exported each year while millions of Indians were dying of starvation. As can be seen from   fig.1 in the peak famine year of 1877-78 a record three lakh tonnes of wheat were exported!!

The worst affected area by far   was South India, particularly the states of Tamil Nadu, Karnataka and Andhra Pradesh, Maharashtra (what used to be Madras Presidency and Bombay Presidency).

The worst affected districts were as follows:

Name of District
Kadapa Kurnool
Madurai Chingleput
Coimbatore Tanjore
Bellary Chennai
North Arcot South Arcot
Nellore Krishna
Salem Trichinopoly

Lord Lytton (or the “Butcher”) who was the Viceroy of India did not give a damn about the dying farmers. In fact he went out of his way to block any kind of help to the dying millions. An ardent believer of Malthusian mumbo jumbo, he believed that it was only right that the “surplus” Indians were being killed off by famine! The emphasis was always on saving money and he deputed his minion Sir Richard Temple to make sure “unnecessary” expenditure was not done on relief works.

Our culture dictates that hungry people should be given food without any conditions, it is considered reprehensible to make starving people work for food. But the inhuman British ethic was not to give any food unless half dead Indians had done some work in their relief camps.

Figure 3 A photograph of Famine Victims of 1877 CE , their bodies are skeletonised and are very near to death (source Wikipedia)

Temple went one step further and instituted relief camps which were not very different to Nazi concentration camps. People already half dead from starvation had to walk hundreds of miles to reach these relief camps, which   were hell holes (see fig 3 above for an illustration of a typical famine sufferers condition). Additionally he instituted a food ration for starving people working in the camps, which   was less than that given to the inmates of Nazi concentration camps. The rations given to prisoners by the Nazis at Buchenwald concentration camp in 1944 had a calorific value of 1627 calories, while the “Temple” ration for famine victims was 1500 calories[12]!

Half dead Indians were expected to work nine hours in the scorching Indian sun with only 450 grams of rice per day[13]. And this 450 grams of rice was supposed to cover the hunger of any dependents or relations of the worker. Mass death was inevitable on this concentration camp diet.

Temple’s policy was specifically designed to discourage people from using the relief camps and thus lessen the financial burden on the British government.  The British policy of systematic mass murder was very similar to the Nazi policy of getting rid of “undesirables”.

Figure 4 The architect of the terrible genocide of 1876-78, “Butcher” Lytton (image source: Wikipedia)

The situation of the people was desperate. But there was no relief from any quarter. Even as people fell dead outside the grain depots, the CBR took the “sensible” measure of posting armed guards in order   to prevent starving Indians from taking over the export depots[14]. Profits before humanity, that’s the British way!

Horrible scenes such as this were enacted throughout the country: “Scores of corpses were tumbled into old wells, because the deaths were too numerous for the miserable relatives to perform the usual funeral rites. Mothers sold their children for a single scanty meal. Husbands flung their wives into ponds, to escape the torment of seeing them perish by the lingering agonies of hunger. Amid these scenes of death the Government of India kept its serenity and cheerfulness unimpaired.”[15]

Or this one describing a scene from Tamil Nadu: “The greater part of the bed of the river is dry, and I was shocked to see that it had been selected as a burying- place where fresh ashes showed that several bodies had been recently burnt. There are pools of water here and there in the bed, and these are in an abominably foul state, owing to bodies out of the graves having been dragged to the water to be eaten. There were ten or twelve pariah dogs prowling about as fat as sheep, and unusually bold, and there were also vultures sailing overhead or perched on the ground. I had been positively assured that bodies were as often thrown down and left as buried, and that dogs could any day be seen eating them, so I resolved to satisfy myself fully of that. Accordingly, after a couple of minutes’ search, I came upon two dogs worrying over the body of a girl about eight years old. They had newly attacked it, and had only torn one of the legs a little, but the corpse was so enormously bloated that it was only from the total length of the figure one could tell it was a child’s. The sight and smell of the locality were so revolting, and the dogs so dangerous, that I did not stay to look for a second body ; but I saw two skulls and a backbone which had been freshly picked.”[16]

The mass murdering Viceroy, Lord “Butcher” Lytton had given specific orders that the news of the famine should be suppressed. But he went ahead with organising a grand durbar in Calcutta in honour of Queen Victoria .While this sham “durbar” was going on nearly 100,000 Indians died in Madras presidency of starvation.

In places like Mysore terrible atrocities were perpetrated on starving women and children. To quote from Mike Davis book, “When desperate women and their hungry children …attempted to steal from gardens or glean grain from fields, they were “branded, tortured, had their noses cut off, and were sometimes killed.”[17]

Example 2: The Terrible Famines of 1896-97 and 1899-1902

Figure 5 Food exports during the years 1892-1902 (source: Famines in Bengal 1770-1943,K C Ghosh,from pages 28-29)

The same dismal story is repeated again in the terrible famines of 1896-1902.As can be seen from fig 3 above rice and wheat exports soared to record levels in the years where the famine was at its peak. The most conservative estimates of Indians who died in these two killer famines are 8.4 million while the more realistic estimate is about 19 million.

Famines and epidemics went hand in hand. One of the main killers during famines was the sky rocketing prices of food grains which made it impossible for a majority of affected Indians to buy food. This same cause was responsible for the millions of deaths occurring during the epidemics[18]. Again the root cause was of course British economic rape of India.

3.2 The Economic Rape of the Indian Farmer

Why were farmers not able to tide over the particularly bad famine years under the Christian British Raj? It was not as if droughts, crop failures etc had never happened in India prior to the tyranny of the Christian British. So why did a few years of particularly bad drought lead to Indian farmers dying in their millions? Below are some of the main economic reasons for their   inability to survive the famines.

3.2.1        Exploitative Land Tax and Brutal collection methods:

The case of Bengal is illuminating to know how the British bled Indians white, even when farmers had nothing to eat. The British attitude towards tax and revenue extraction remained virtually unchanged till they left India. Bengal was the first to feel the devastating effects of the Christian British rule after East India Company became virtual rulers of the province post Battle of Plassey in 1757 CE. A devastating famine in   1768 CE killed off nearly ten million people in Bengal and Bihar.

Figure 6 Gross Revenue Collected during the Bengal Famine of 1768 (source: R C Dutt, The Economic History of India Under Early British Rule. From the Rise of the British Power in 1757 to the Accession of Queen Victoria in 1837. Vol. I, page 46)

But even while the dance of death was going on, record amounts of tax were recovered from the people by the most violent methods which included murder, rape etc.(see fig 4 above for a graphical representation of the revenues extracted by East India Company).

In Warren Hastings own words, “Notwithstanding the loss of at least one-third of the inhabitants of the province, and the consequent decrease of the cultivation, the nett collections of the year 1771 exceeded even those of I768. . . . It was naturally to be expected that the diminution of the revenue should have kept an equal pace with the other consequences of so great a calamity. That it did not was owing to its being violently kept up to its former standard.”[19]

And what was done to lessen the sufferings of the Indian people?

Absolutely nothing of course! The British   tyrants and the Indian traitors who collaborated with them forced farmers to   sell   seeds required for the next harvest and made immense profits by manipulating the prices of life saving grain[20]. Thus on one hand farmers were deprived of their sole source of future sustenance and on the other hand the sky rocketing prices of food made it impossible to buy life saving food grains!

3.2.2 The Quandary of Cash Crops

Farmers were forced to grow cash crops such as cotton, opium, indigo simply to keep paying off the extortionate demands of the British leeches. The Manchester Chamber of Commerce dictated and controlled the growth of cotton in fertile areas such as Berar (Vidarbha in Maharashtra).The entire social system of   Vidarbha was destroyed so that the British could put in place their own rapacious system known as   khatedari which was implemented in 1877 CE [21].The old landlord families were either destroyed or pauperised and the British government became the supreme owner of the farm lands.

Crops such as cotton grew readily in the fertile black soil of Deccan but had the side effect of destroying the fertility of the soil. In addition the British parasites even turned cow dung which had acted as a natural fertiliser, into a taxable revenue source[22].The   Manchester Chamber of Commerce pushed for the introduction of railways in Vidarbha so that it could have a vast   captive cotton growing plantation. The capitalists of Britain wanted a secure source of   raw cotton which they could turn to in case of any fluctuations in cotton supply from America. The poor farmers of Vidarbha were instantly exposed to the fluctuations in the world markets and had absolutely no share in the massive profits made by the British bloodsuckers. Thus when famine hit the impoverished farmers died in their lakhs.

Also increasing indebtness forced the farmers to sell their plots of land to sahukars (money lenders).This led to the concentration of fertile lands in the hands of a few thousand very rich non -resident landlords. The previously self sufficient farmer was forced to work as a labourer on his own land. Even those farmers who managed to hold on to their land, the acreage under their ownership was for most part between 5-6 acres, which was not sufficient to support the farmer and his family. Added to this was an influx of artisans, craftsmen etc   who had been thrown out of work due to the British murder of Indian industry. They had no option but to work as   labourers on bigger farms with virtually no resources to withstand a famine. The   grim story of Vidarbha was repeated in Bihar, Karnataka, Tamil Nadu etc.

3.2.3        The Tyranny of Taxation

The   amount of tax traditionally paid by the farmer   under the Maratha empire (or previously the Mughal regime) was between 16-17% of the   gross produce[23]. Again this was flexible depending on the conditions prevailing.ie if crops had failed the demand by the state would be reduced or in some cases suspended for the time being. What this used to do was to leave farmers with enough reserves to tide   them over though difficult times.eg under the Maratha Empire tax collection was flexible and kept in line with the circumstances of the day.

But under the Christian British Raj there was no such humanitarian response to the   life threatening crises faced by the Indian farmer. The tax itself came to about 33% of gross produce[24]. But this tax was not the end of things. On top of this basic tax were different taxes for roads, schools, post offices, dispensary, water tax etc. Taxes were levied on the most flimsy of excuses and the poor farmer had   no protection against the brutal force exercised by the British rulers. All these miscellaneous taxes added upto nearly   100% of the farmers real assets!![25]

The worst thing was that the British government would confiscate food stocks at the time of revenue collection. The ryots(farmers) had no option but to borrow money at rip off interest rates from money lenders to release their grain stocks[26].In fact the entire class of bloodsucking moneylenders came into existence because of the policies of the Christian British Raj.

The way taxes were raised was extremely arbitrary and without any basis in reality. The rise was based on the value of the land, so called “public works” done by the CBR (which included railways, roads, schools, dispensaries etc). The tax was raised irrespective of the fact whether the farmer was getting better prices for his produce or not. This inevitably led to the situation of the already beggared farmer paying over 100% of his earnings in tax. Also, the arbitrary rise in taxes could not be appealed in the courts in Bombay Presidency. Thus there was not even the illusion of justice.

Quite a few examples are given of   the unsustainable level of debt   burden carried by Indian  farmers in RC Dutts “Famine and Land Assessments”. To quote one of these,

Murar the Patel, a young man, farms sixty acres, but there has been no produce this year. The farm is mortgaged to the extent of about 3000 rupees. He estimates his last year’s produce at 375 rupees, of which he paid 104 rupees to Government. He had to buy four bullocks for 100 rupees, and pay 40 rupees for servants, and was therefore unable to pay anything to the money-lender. The other expenses of cultivation amounted to nearly 60 rupees. He kept the rest for himself, his wife, uncle, and two children. He has been served with notice of assessment. He had six bullocks, and has lost four”.[27]

The net effect of this crushing taxation was to strip away   any saving capability of the farmers in years when the harvests were good. The following observation by A K Connell illustrates this point well,

Against this calamity (drought) the cultivator, when unable to get a permanent water-supply from wells,* tanks, canals, or rivers, has provided   from, time immemorial by the storage  of grain in air-tight pits or earthen¬ ware jars. If war or taxation, levied in excess, or at times of distress, has depleted these stores, then the worst horrors of famine have swept over the land;”[28]

The farmers were permanently in deep debt to money lenders just to keep paying the extortionate tax demands. They had to sell even their reserve food stocks just to stay afloat. This left the   farmer with no   buffer   when famines hit   him. With every passing year the farmers sank deeper into desperate poverty and further into the clutches of money lenders. Every year lakhs of farmers were dispossessed of their small plots of land.

In fact   in the Bombay and Madras Presidencies   the land tax demands kept on increasing every thirty years by an extortionate amount. For e.g. when the remnants of the Maratha empire were finally conquered by the British in 1817 CE the revenue  from those parts was  80 Lakhs, within a year it went upto 115 lakhs and in a few more years it was 150 lakhs[29]. So   between 1817 and 1818   in a span of one year there was a jump of nearly 43% in the actual revenue collected!

How was this possible? Did the farmers of   Deccan feel so happy at being conquered by the British that they expressed their joy   by paying more tax? Or did the soil become super productive thanks to the British “genius”?

The reality was horrifying and dismal. Farmers were fleeced of every spare anna on their persons. Brutal collection methods were employed to force   farmers to part with their meagre savings. Unable to withstand the torture meted out by the British on non payment of taxes many farmers abandoned their lands and fled into the areas ruled by the Princely states[30].Millions of acres of previously fertile land went out of cultivation as farmers voted with their feet and abandoned their lands[31].

3.3   So….Where did the money go?

You   will be justified in asking the question  … “Where did all this revenue extracted by the British murderers go?”

The major part of the revenue was sent to Britain. Every year nearly   20-30 million pounds were drained from India[32].This did not include the enormous amount of   money paid as salaries to the white British who occupied nearly all the important positions in India. In 1892 itself the total value of the jobs reserved for white British was over 15 million pounds sterling while the value of jobs reserved for Indians was little over 3 million pounds[33]!

Additionally we need to add to the above amounts the huge amount of personal wealth accumulated by white traders, officers etc who remitted most of it back to Britain. For a better idea of the huge amounts of wealth drained out of India by the British parasites, I would recommend reading R C Dutts books.

Another big drain on India’s finances was the cost of   maintenance of   Britain’s armed forces and funding its wars overseas. To give an example: while butcher Lytton blocked any “excess” expenditure on saving the victims of the famine of 1876-78, he fully utilised Indian revenues to fund his disastrous afghan war adventure (this was the second Anglo-afghan war fought from 1878-1880 CE). The same thing happened during the genocide of 1898-1902; our money was used to fund the Boer war in South Africa and the Third Anglo-Afghan war. Strange as it may sound, we were actually paying the British to kill us and carry on their genocides elsewhere.

3.3.1 The Fraud of the “Famine Grant”

After the terrible holocaust of 1876-78, another money grabbing tax was dumped upon Indians. This was known as the “Annual Famine Grant”. Theoretically what it was supposed to do was to raise enough money to prevent another holocaust like that of 1876-78 recurring.

But the tax was hated by Indians as soon as it was levied in 1877 CE and for a very good reason. After   putting on a show that the funds were not being misused, the money collected in the name of the famine grant was quietly combined with the general revenue of the country[34]. This meant the British parasites could use the money as they wanted. By the time the next terrible holocaust of 1897-1902 hit, over 22 crore rupees had been collected under this fraudulent   tax, out of which only 17 crore rupees had been spent[35].

But how was this giant reservoir of Indian money used? Nearly 58% of the seventeen crore rupees (to the tune of 10 crore rupees) was spent on “protective railways” and in paying “interest upon Indian Midland and Bengal Nagpore railways”!  Hey wait a minute…. Weren’t Railways Good for India?

Wait a minute you say…Wasn’t spending money on developing railway infrastructure a good thing? After all   weren’t the British parasites spending the money on “creating” modern infrastructure in India? So, what’s the catch?

First of all, the money was being collected for a very specific purpose i.e. to make sure that a repeat of 1876-78 famine did not occur. Using it for anything else was simply a theft   of funds.

Secondly, the existence of railways did not help in any way saving people from famine. All they did was to make the transport of food grains towards the coastal ports easier, thus depriving inner provinces of much needed food grain .The advent of railways was directly linked to the rise in food prices[36].If food prices shot up in one area, the food price rise was transmitted to other areas as well. This only served to worsen the starvation problem as poor farmers already drowning in debt due to excessive taxation were simply unable to buy any food. By this stage the poor farmers had already sold their last stocks of grain to moneylenders thus leaving them defenceless in face of famine.

The railways were also carriers of epidemic diseases such as cholera, influenza etc. Indians died in their millions due to these epidemic, their immune systems destroyed by starvation. Plus the traditional water drainage and water conservation systems were destroyed by the haphazardly constructed railway embankments, tracks etc.

Could the government have interfered and made sure the food prices did not sky rocket out of the reach of the poor and could the railways have been used to rush life saving food grains? This should have been done but never was; the British policy was not to interfere with “free trade”. i.e. their profits should not be affected!

Instead each devastating holocaust was used as to reap more profits for the British vultures by using the excuse that “there was not enough railway to make sure starvation does not take place” and thus more railway tracks were laid at the Indian tax payers expense!!

By the time of the holocaust of 1898 almost   26,059 miles of railway track had been laid down in India Even at this stage R C Dutt describes the railways as being “overdone”.

Thirdly, most of the railway projects in India were specifically designed to make British speculators and capitalist vulture’s very rich. A minimum return profit of 5% was guaranteed by the British raj to British investors, irrespective of whether the railways made a profit or a loss[37]. Most of the railway lines made losses or served no practical purpose, but British investors still made a large profit as all losses were paid by the Indian tax payer. There are many examples of how speculators in London dictated what lines should be constructed and what profits they would extract from the Indian tax payer.

Fourthly, the forced expansion to railways in India was primarily for the benefit of British industry. Everything including coal, steel for tracks/bridges etc, railway engines, and rolling stock was imported from Britain[38]. In fact at one stage it was cheaper to buy British coal in Calcutta than Bengal coal[39]!

There was zero benefit to Indians from the “modern technology” dumped on our heads by the British leeches. For nothing was produced in India! Any attempt by Indians to set up manufacturing facilities in India was forcefully discouraged.

Freight on the railways was heavily subsidized, thus directly undercutting traditional transports such as boats which plied the major river systems. As any loss made by the railways was picked up by the Indian tax payer, the British Raj had no problems with the huge losses made by the railways. By 1884   the total loss made by the railways in India was staggering £37 million pounds sterling[40].

This was what an astute British observer had to say about railways being constructed in India (specifically with reference to districts of Raipur & Bilaspur in Chhattisgarh, Sambhalpur in Orissa):

At present there is no doubt that the peasantry in these districts are most prosperous. They make their own clothes ,they grow their own food; they have good pasture for their cattle, cheap fuel, and forests to attract rain. A railway will destroy the home weaving, absorb the profits of the carriers, cut down the forests, inflate wages and then depress them, and finally raise the land-tax. In twenty years’ time there will most probably be a famine.”[41]

The railway line in question was the Bengal-Nagpur Railway which was completed by 1890.This was a remarkably prophetic prediction as within ten years (in the holocaust of 1898) these districts suffered lakhs of deaths due to starvation and economic impoverishment. But wasn’t some of the Famine grant used for “Protective Irrigation”?

Along with the railways, irrigation works (i.e. canals, dams etc) are frequently trumpeted as an example of “good” that the British did in India. But the fact remains that they were only built in those areas where the British had a commercial interest in growing grains or cash crops.

Even where built, they had a devastating effect on the fertility of the soils and on the general health of the Indian people. Previously fertile soil was rendered saline and waterlogged, unfit for cultivation due to the seepage of water through the canals[42]. The construction of river embankments led to a blocking of the natural system of rich fertile alluvial soil being carried by river action to the low lying plains. This in turn rapidly made millions of acres of fertile land useless and considerably lowered the quality of drinking water. The natural drainage systems were further blocked by the “modern” system of canals and embankments leading to water logging and creation of mosquito breeding swamps[43]. Due to these, malaria, cholera etc spread on an epidemic scale in India; killing millions (the toll from the epidemics actually comes close to the famine toll).e.g. the Influenza epidemic of 1918-19 killed approximately 12-13 million Indians.[44]

Traditional Indian irrigation systems were neglected and allowed to fall into ruin. Here is a British officer’s description of the superb irrigation systems of pre-British India (the below refers to south India):

In no part of the world has so much been done by ancient native rulers for the development of resources of the country. The further south one goes ,and the further the old Hindu polity was removed from the disturbing influence of foreign conquest ,the more complete and elaborate was the system of agriculture and irrigation works connected with it….Every available source of supply was utilised ,and works in advance of supply have been executed, for tanks  have been very generally constructed, not only for general rainfall, but for exceptional rainfall…Irrigation from rivers and channels..was also carried on.[45]

The British had no economic benefit of maintain and extending this system, so they let it fall into ruin. If these systems worked fine, what was the point of constructing expensive canal works which led to disaster?

4. The Devastating Effect of the British made Holocausts

4.1 Stagnation of Population Growth & a Short Life Span

Due to the horrific death toll extracted by the successive holocausts of the 19th and 20th centuries population growth stagnated and in many areas of India even went into negative. (Unless otherwise specified, all the data has been taken from the census reports for the relevant years).

Decade Life Expectancy
1871-81 24.6
1881-91 25
1891-1901 23.8
1901-11 22.9
1911-21 20.1

Table 1 Average Life Expectancy of Indians from 1871-1921 (source:  Death in India, 1871-1921Author(s): Ira Klein, The Journal of Asian Studies, Vol. 32, No. 4 (Aug., 1973), pp. 639-659)

If you were an Indian living in the 1920’s the chances of your surviving beyond the age of twenty were extremely slim. The average life span of Indians went on steadily decreasing as the 1920’s approached. Table 1 above gives an idea of the average life expectancy of our people under the “beneficial” rule of the Christian British Raj.

Figure 7 Population in millions under British rule


Figure 8 Percentage increase in population from 1881-1941 under the Christian British Raj

From figures 6 & 7   above   it is clear that for most part of the British rule population growth was more or less stagnant. Over a period of 70 years the population grew by barely 100 million. The effect of devastating british made genocides can be seen in the census reports of 1881,1901,1921.What the graphs do not show is the terrible Bengal genocide of 1943 in which nearly seven million people died, as the last census under the Christian British Raj was done in 1941.

Now look at the same graphs below (fig 8 & 9) for population growth after independence in 1947.Keep in mind this does not include more than 33% of pre 1947 India. After 1947, Pakistan (Bangladesh and the present day rump remaining of West Pakistan), Burma etc were separated from India.

But even in the remaining Indian landmass the population has grown by over 500 million from 1961-2001!! From a simple glance at figures 6 and 8, it looks like some kind of a negative force has been taken off after 1947 and the population growth is back to normal.

The average percentage population growth after independence is around 23%!!

Figure 9  Population  growth in Azad Hind after 1947


Figure 10 Percentage increase in Population after 1947 in Azad Hind


4.2 Destruction of Traditional Indian Society

If we start talking about destruction of   traditional Indian village society, the logical question arises: “What was Indian society before the British conquest like?”

Going in detail is beyond the scope of this article, for a detailed description a reading of Sri Dharampal’s book “A Beautiful Tree” is highly recommended. For the time being as we are concerned with famine and traditional Indian society’s response to it, this short description by A K Connell will suffice,

The spirit of charity, deeply engrained in the native heart, has held the village society together, so that even the landless classes—with the exception perhaps of the very lowest outcasts—have been kept alive by their richer neighbours[46] .

This harmony and humanity of traditional Indian society was what kept droughts from developing into murderous holocausts. But this harmonious system broke down under the constant pressure and manipulation by the Christian British Raj. As we saw above, even in normal times simple survival had become a constant struggle for Indian farmers. Added to this the removal of traditional powers of the village chiefs   and into the hands of   inhuman British revenue/settlement officers destroyed the traditional village   accountability.

The horrors of the British made   holocausts destroyed traditional Indian society in more ways than one. As all hope of life ran out, village communities who had existed peacefully for centuries turned on each other for that last morsel of grain. Terrible violence followed as farmers fought for   the last stored supplies of grain[47].The Deccan region, covering Maharashtra and parts of Karnataka was worst affected in the holocausts of 1876 and 1898-1902.

Rural society in Maharashtra broke down under the relentless hammering of the British made holocausts. The   farmers in Maharashtra were traditionally militarised and had formed the backbone of the Maratha armies which brought down the Mughal Empire and kept the British parasites at bay for nearly a hundred years. But in the new circumstances groups which had traditionally lived and fought side by side, turned on each other[48].

Many villages were completely wiped off the map as almost all of their inhabitants died in the famines. Lakhs of Indians were forced by starvation to sign up as indentured labourers (a polite name for slaves) and shipped off to work in plantations in Sri Lanka, Mauritius, Guyana and Natal[49].

The condition of Indian women under the Christian British Raj was especially bad, but under famine it became even worse. Rape, sexual abuse and exploitation of Indian women were normal and accepted British practices. Under the racist justice system in India, white British and Anglo-Indians routinely got away with rape and murder.  Official British propaganda portrayed all Indian women (no exceptions) as “prostitutes” and carriers of sexually transmitted diseases (such as syphilis, gonorrhoea etc )[50].

In short the according to the British: Indian women had no honour and could be violated at will. In every military cantonment brothels (filled with Indian women) were constructed for the “exclusive” use of British soldiers[51].These were known as “sadr” bazaars. In times of famine, desperate starving Indian women were forced to work as prostitutes simply in order to survive and keep their children alive[52].Keeping in line with their hypocrisy, the British authorities simply designated them as professional prostitutes and subjected them to the degrading “medical examinations”. But white soldiers were exempt from being examined for sexually transmitted diseases as it would affect their morale!

In most   British orchestrated genocides such as the Bengal Famine of 1943, the death rate amongst male Indians was very high, leading to lakhs of women being left defenceless against being exploited by the British and their Indian collaborators. Mass prostitution resulted from the dire circumstances of the famine[53].

4.3 Harvesting the Dead

The main winners from these genocides apart from the British government, British people and speculators in London were   the Christian missionaries. I personally consider a Christian missionary to be the worst form of a human being. They thrive on the suffering, misery and distress of people. Their entire life revolves around converting non Christians by fraud, coercion or force. Their chief concern in life is “harvesting souls”, which is missionary speak for converting as many people as they can. Much like Islamic suicide bombers who are motivated by the promise of 72 virgin women in the next life, Christian missionaries are motivated by the premise of capturing the maximum number of souls before they depart this earth.

In India every famine/ disaster was a godsend for missionaries as they were able to convert lakhs of desperate people by holding out the promise of life saving grain. The interesting thing is that majority of   missionaries were white Europeans or Americans and had an ample supply of   food grains even when Indians were falling dead all around them.

In the later phase of British colonial rule, Indian converts to Christianity were increasingly used to ensure greater “penetration” of Hindu society. The spread of Christianity in India on a large scale closely coincides with the occurrence of famines/epidemics. Mahatma Gandhi called people who converted to Christianity under extreme circumstances as “rice Christians”.

Figure 11  Percentage Growth of Christians in India from 1871-1921 (all data sourced from Relevant census reports)

As can be seen from the graph there is a spurt in the number of Christians   in 1881 (right after the genocide of 1876-78), 1901 (during the genocide of 1898-1902), 1921 (after the influenza epidemic of 1918-1919).This shows as bogus the claims of missionaries that Hindus converted to Christianity to “escape” the caste system (or whatever vile reason they could come up with).

Here is an example of mass conversions during famine,

The high-water mark in the history of the Tinnevelly Church was reached in the year 1877. That year has been made ever memorable by the great famine which desolated the south. Ordinary missionary work was retarded in a heroic effort to save human life. Relief was rendered to Hindu and Christian alike ; hundreds were saved from starvation and death. In a few months 30,000 Shanans placed themselves under Christian instruction, not so much with a view to material gain as that they had felt the attractive power of love, ” The conviction prevailed “ so wrote Bishop Caldwell, “ that whilst Hinduism had left the famine-stricken to die, Christianity had stepped in like an angel from heaven with its sympathy to cheer them with its effectual succour.”[54]

Or this account of a Maharashtrian lady called Ramabai, who had converted to Christianity and zealously prayed for Hindu women to be widowed so she could convert them! The sickness of her mind can only be marvelled at!

The great famines of 1896-1897 and of 1900 gave Ramabai her opportunity. Before the earlier famine she asked that God would give her a great increase of conversions and prayed for a number of widows far in excess of anything her institution could hold. On the outbreak of famine she travelled to the Central Provinces. When the famine was over she had between five and six hundred women and children.”[55]

5.  In Conclusion: Famines as a Strategic British Weapon

Thanks to   Parag Tope ji, Brihaspati ji and Atri ji from Bharat Rakshak for pointing out the strategic aspect of the British genocides in India. I will very briefly go over the possible strategic reasons behind the British genocides in India. These are just brief outlines of selected areas, a determined patriot will need to do deeper research and connect the dots.

Maharashtra/Rajasthan: In heavily militarised societies such as in the Deccan and Rajasthan, even common people used to take up arms to fight invaders such as the Mughals, British etc. In fact the backbone of the Maratha armies were farmers from the Deccan. The pan Indian character of the Maratha Empire is illustrated by the fact that in the Anglo-Indian war of 1857, the main leaders (Tantia Tope, Rani Laxmi Bai, Nanasaheb Peshwa) were Maharashtrian, but the people of   Northern India threw their weight behind them in the war of liberation.

The destruction of this sturdy village society was essential to the British not only for easy economic exploitation but for total control over India. A heavily militarised society was bound to fight back against the injustices inflicted by the British. Once entire social classes were destroyed and people reduced to eating scraps for survival, the chances of a fully fledged pan Indian war were significantly reduced. The terrible famines of   1791-92, 1802-03, 1813-14, 1876-78, and 1898-1902 completely destroyed the social fabric of rural society in Maharashtra.

Uttar Pradesh: During the Anglo-Indian war of 1857, the British pursued a policy of   mass genocide by killing lakhs of villagers in Northern India. These villagers had been the main source of support and logistics to the freedom fighters. This genocide was directly responsible for the terrible famine of 1860 in Uttar Pradesh & Punjab. Over two million Indians died in this famine. The reason given for the famine of 1860 was that there was not enough land being cultivated due to a lack of   farmers who were either dead or had fled to safer areas during 1857.

Bengal Presidency: The two main famines which hit Bengal Presidency were in 1769-1772   and in 1942-44.Over 17 million people died in these two genocides. In 1769-1772 the famine was particularly advantageous for the British as they were facing ferocious resistance from armies of Sanyasis (immortalised in the great patriotic novel Anandamath by  Sri Bankim Chandra Chattopadhyay).The death of nearly ten million people in the famine virtually destroyed the local support base of resistance to the British.

In 1942, the “brave” British armed forces were being thrashed black and blue by the Japanese. The Japanese had chased the British right till the gates of India. Leading the attack on the British were the patriots of the Azad Hind Fauj (Indian National Army) under the inspiring leadership of Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose. Once the INA   forces reached Bengal it was a certainty that the people of Bengal would join them. At that point it would be have been game over for the British in India.

To avert this, the British administration destroyed over 25,000 boats which were the lifeline of the people in Bengal. Plus food stocks were confisticated from  a large part of Bengal, thus condemning the people to death by starvation. Within months the Bengali people were fighting for survival and this destroyed the support base of the INA. The toll from the genocide of 1942-44 was horrific and over seven million Bengalis died in this genocide.

The above are just select examples of how the British pursued a genocidal scorched earth policy against our people whenever their rule was threatened.

Only by reading our history can we appreciate the magnitude of sacrifices made by Vasudev Balwant Phadke,Bhagat Singh, Chandrashekar Azad, Masterda Surya Sen and countless others. And we also can begin to understand why many of our freedom fighters performed the supreme sacrifice with Vande Mataram on their lips. We need to get out of the one track mind set which seems to pervade our country and become more alive to the threats from within and without.

वन्दे मातरम्

[2] Strictly speaking this type of a drought is known as a “meteorological drought”. There are two more types of droughts namely “hydrological” and “agricultural”. For simplicity I have mentioned only the meteorological drought. Although all three can be considered linked to one another especially in India.

[4] Susan Visvanathan, The Homogeneity of Fundamentalism: Christianity, British Colonialism and India in the Nineteenth Century, Studies in History, 2000,16:221

[6] Claudius Buchanan, Memories of the Expediency of an Ecclesiastical Establishment for British India: Both as the means of Perpetuating the Christian Religion Among Our Countrymen; And as a Foundation for the Ultimate Civilization of the Natives, London, 1805, Part II, para 6.quoted in Sita Ram Goel, History if Hindu-Christian Encounters AD304 to 1996,Chapter 8.availiable at : http://voiceofdharma.org/books/hhce/index.htm

[7] Ibid.

[8]Bernard S. Cohn, ‘Recruitment and training of British civil servants in India, 1600–1860’.quoted by  Ian Copeland, CHRISTIANITY AS AN ARM OF EMPIRE: THE AMBIGUOUS CASE OF INDIA UNDER THE COMPANY, c. 1813 –1858,The Historical Journal, 49, 4 (2006), pp. 1025–1054

[9] Ibid, see 7 above.

[10] I have taken this from the Wikipedia article on Malthus. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Malthus#1815:_The_Nature_of_Rent

[11] Malthusian Population Theory and Indian Famine Policy in the Nineteenth CenturyAuthor(s): S. Ambirajan. Source: Population Studies, Vol. 30, No. 1 (Mar., 1976), pp. 5-14

[12] Mike Davis,.Late Victorian Holocausts,El Nino Famines and Making of the Third World,pg 39,table 1.3.

[13] Mike Davis,.Late Victorian Holocausts,El Nino Famines and Making of the Third World,pg 38

[14] Digby quoted by Mike Davis,.Late Victorian Holocausts,El Nino Famines and Making of the Third World,pg 45.

[15] Osborne quoted by Mike Davis, Late Victorian Holocausts,El Nino Famines and Making of the Third World,pg 53

[16] Digby, William (1878), The Famine Campaign in Southern India: Madras and Bombay Presidencies and province of Mysore, 1876-1878, Volume 1,page105

[17] Klein & Elliott quoted by Mike Davis, Late Victorian Holocausts,El Nino Famines and Making of the Third World,pg 46.

[18] Death in India, 1871-1921Author(s): Ira Klein, The Journal of Asian Studies, Vol. 32, No. 4 (Aug., 1973), pp. 639-659,quoting

[19] R C Dutt,Famines and Land Assessments, pg.53,  quoting Hunter’s “Annals from Rural Bengal”.

[20] Ibid,page 44

[21] Mike Davis, Late Victorian Holocausts,El Nino Famines and Making of the Third World,pg 313

[22] Mike Davis, Late Victorian Holocausts,El Nino Famines and Making of the Third World,pg 327

[23] Ibid,page 19

[24] Ibid,page 23

[25] Ibid,page 26

[26] Mike Davis, Late Victorian Holocausts,El Nino Famines and Making of the Third World,pg 325

[27] Ibid,page 110

[28] Indian pauperism, free trade and railways: a paper read before the East India Association, 1884,Connell, A. K. Source: Bristol Selected Pamphlets, (1884),page 9

[29] ibid,page 43.

[30] Ibid,page 43

[31] Ibid, page 37

[32] R C Dutt, Indian Famines and Their Causes, page  10

[33] R C Dutt,Famines and Land Assessments, preface xix

[34] R C Dutt,Famines and Land Assessments, pg.78

[35] R C Dutt,Famines and Land Assessments, pg.79

[36] Economic History of India; From Pre-colonial Times to 1991,Dietmar Rothermund, page 34,table 4.1,quoting M.Mukherjee

[37] Economic History of India; From Pre-colonial Times to 1991,Dietmar Rothermund, page 32

[38] Economic History of India; From Pre-colonial Times to 1991,Dietmar Rothermund, page 33

[39] Economic History of India; From Pre-colonial Times to 1991,Dietmar Rothermund, page 33

[40] Indian pauperism, free trade and railways: a paper read before the East India Association, 1884,Connell, A. K. Source: Bristol Selected Pamphlets, (1884),page 6

[41] Indian pauperism, free trade and railways: a paper read before the East India Association, 1884,Connell, A. K. Source: Bristol Selected Pamphlets, (1884),page 6-7,footnote.

[42] Death in India, 1871-1921Author(s): Ira Klein, The Journal of Asian Studies, Vol. 32, No. 4 (Aug., 1973), pp. 639-659,quoting R. B. Lal and K. S. Shah

[43] Death in India, 1871-1921Author(s): Ira Klein, The Journal of Asian Studies, Vol. 32, No. 4 (Aug., 1973), pp. 639-659,quoting R. B. Lal and K. S. Shah

[44] Death in India, 1871-1921Author(s): Ira Klein, The Journal of Asian Studies, Vol. 32, No. 4 (Aug., 1973), pp. 639-659,quoting Census of India, 1921

[45] Mike Davis, Late Victorian Holocausts,El Nino Famines and Making of the Third World,pg 336,quoting Col.Anderson.

[46] Indian pauperism, free trade and railways: a paper read before the East India Association, 1884,Connell, A. K. Source: Bristol Selected Pamphlets, (1884),page 10

[47] Mike Davis, Late Victorian Holocausts,El Nino Famines and Making of the Third World,pg 49

[48] Mike Davis, Late Victorian Holocausts,El Nino Famines and Making of the Third World,pg 339,quoting Kaiwar

[49] Mike Davis, Late Victorian Holocausts,El Nino Famines and Making of the Third World,pg 112

[50] Venereal Disease, Prostitution, and the Politics of Empire: The Case of British IndiaAuthor(s): Philippa Levine, Journal of the History of Sexuality, Vol. 4, No. 4 (Apr., 1994), pp. 579-602,quoting:IOL, L/MIL/7/13810, Surgeon-General of Bengal to Director-General, Army Medical Department, London, June 9, 1884, Letter 9903-A.

[51] Venereal Disease, Prostitution, and the Politics of Empire: The Case of British IndiaAuthor(s): Philippa Levine: Journal of the History of Sexuality, Vol. 4, No. 4 (Apr., 1994), pp. 579-602

[52] Venereal Disease, Prostitution, and the Politics of Empire: The Case of British IndiaAuthor(s): Philippa Levine: Journal of the History of Sexuality, Vol. 4, No. 4 (Apr., 1994), pp. 579-602

[53] K CGhosh,Famine in Bengal 1770-1943,page 83

[54] S K Datta, The Desire of India ,Page 178-79

[55] S K Datta, The Desire of India Page 249


  1. Thanks for the post.

    In my mind there is no doubt that the English were directly responsible for the starvation of the Indian population. Recent documents emerged showing that in 1943, the War Office (i.e. the British Government) decided not to divert some of its ships away from the war effort to help the already weakened population of Bengal.

    However, I doubt your claim that the Brits were voluntarily creating famine conditions in India as a weapon in the hands of the administration. If anything, the administration tried hard to help when a famine appeared (cf. several novels by Kipling which does not hide the horror and the feeling of failure of the old colonials).

    Moreover your claim that there was no famine-related death after 1947 should not be taken as face value: Bengladesh 1974 is a terrible exception to that rule.

    Regarding the rise of the Indian population after the independence, the same is true of bascally every single colonized country around the world. Take Algeria for instance whose population rose by nearly a factor 10 in less than four decades.


    Comment by Ben — January 9, 2011 @ 2:55 pm | Reply

  2. “However, I doubt your claim that the Brits were voluntarily creating famine conditions in India as a weapon in the hands of the administration. If anything, the administration tried hard to help when a famine appeared (cf. several novels by Kipling which does not hide the horror and the feeling of failure of the old colonials).”

    what help? Kipling was a known racist,i couldnt care less what he wrote or thought.Oh right you mean the “Famine Code” and the “Famine Insurance grant”.The famine code wasnt worth the paper it was written on and i have addressed the fraud of the Famine inusrance in my article.
    If the white British felt so bad could you explain why millions kept dying like clockwork?

    The British were very much aware of the conditions they were creating.I have given enough references,please read them for more enlightenment.The administration was specifically directed to save as much money as they could in every famine.Please read Mike Davis book for more info.I would specifically direct you towards the horrors of the “Temple ration” and the hell holes that were the reilef camps.
    In our culture we do not expect a starving person to work for food.It is the greatness of Indian society that starving people are given food unquestionably!

    “Moreover your claim that there was no famine-related death after 1947 should not be taken as face value: Bengladesh 1974 is a terrible exception to that rule.”

    i am very specifically talking about present day India.Bangladesh is an islamic country and has carved out its own destiny.Could you show me where famine deaths have taken place in India?

    anyway thanks for having a look.

    Comment by Yogeshwar Shastri — January 9, 2011 @ 4:20 pm | Reply

    • I am researching history and am surprised by your racist and warped portrayal of the Indian famines under so called British rule which (as you know) was also Mughal rule.

      You over simplify, you misquote or ignore relevant facts, you are vehemently racist against whites and your view has to be disqualified by any academic as a result. Unfortunately, Indian history pre 1700 is not accurately documented from region to region (India was not a country back then) but it took me less than 5 minutes of research to find the Deccan famine of 1630-32 which killed over 2 million people – I am sure it wil take your warped mind an equal amount of time to blame this on white people too – you sad sad man

      Comment by Tim — January 3, 2012 @ 5:35 pm | Reply

  3. Thanks for your hard work and sharing of such priceless data.

    Also, read somewhere that during the Japanese offensive in Malaya in the 2nd World War , the Brits turned tail and ran, leaving the Indians to face the the brutal attack. The Indians showed exemplary courage and stood up to the Japs.
    Meanwhile, the Brits created a halo around themselves thro creative writing and creative film-making. They portrayed themselves as heroic losers, fighting against desperate odds.
    Do we have any write-ups on this?

    Comment by seadog4227 — January 11, 2011 @ 3:30 am | Reply

    • Thanks for the good feedback.The topic you have raised is actually new to me.I will pass it around and see if someone can come up with a reliable account.ill keep you posted.

      Comment by Yogeshwar Shastri — January 11, 2011 @ 9:50 am | Reply

      • Please read my blog post on the same topic of how british ran away in singapore..


        Infact, many ex-soldiers say that it is the fall of singapore in 1942, that was a game changer in world history.. Japanese proved that British can be defeated, and more than that, the britishers ranaway without fighting off, exposed their hollow propoganda..

        Your blog is excellent, and i would like to have your email for future communications..

        Comment by senthil — May 27, 2012 @ 10:54 am

  4. Remember the Boer concentration camps where 10% of the entire Boer population died as a result of British policies.

    That was how Brits treated fellow White Protestant Christians.

    Imagine their contempt for dark skinned pagans.

    This by the way is Christian “love” at its best.

    Comment by Julian — January 17, 2011 @ 8:29 am | Reply

  5. The Wikipedia discussion pages on India (see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:India)and the Wikipedia article titled Famine in India (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Famine_in_India) have a different take on things. To get a gauge of how revisionist your view history is, try to participate in the discussion page or edit “Famine in India.

    Comment by Rajesh — February 2, 2011 @ 10:22 am | Reply

    • Rajesh,thanks for your comment.

      The Wikipedia pages regarding Indian history and colonial rule are unfortunatley more often than not inaccurate and present a very biased viewpoint (the British one in the case of their colonial crimes) .I read all the sources I quote and only form my opinion after that.
      Since we have been spoon fed the British version of history,the truth starts seeming like “revisionist”.We have a long way to go before we are mentally decolonised.
      I appreciate the need to edit/participate in the Wiki stuff but I have limited time and i prefer to spend that time researching,writing and translating my articles into Indic languages.
      i have never seen any point in arguing with British over the crimes they committed as they will never accept their crimes.I have personal experience of this.We keep presenting eveidence of their crimes and they keep shrugging it off.
      The correct way to go is to educate our people on British crimes and build up a critical mass of opinion.When the next generation of Indians comes to power they will have a sound understanding of how to deal with the British.

      Comment by Yogeshwar Shastri — February 2, 2011 @ 11:49 am | Reply

      • ‘When the next generation of Indians comes to power they will have a sound understanding of how to deal with the British’.

        Are your racist views driving you to insanity? Why should the next generation of Indians deal with the hext generation of British based on the events of a long defunct empire?

        Should the British hate the Italian Romans for slavery, the Norwegian/French Normans for partial Genocide and the Scandanavians for the rape and pillage of the Eastern Coast of England. Should they hate the Celts from middle Europe and the Saxons and Angles from Germany for eradicating the ancient Britons. You are a hate mongering fool and a hateful racist

        Comment by Tim — January 3, 2012 @ 5:42 pm

  6. There are some warriors on Wikipedia who try to fight on from the Indian viewpoint but they are outnumbered by British editors and since Wikipedia works by consensus they are unable to get their point incorporated in the Wikipedia articles. The bigger problem is the inability of the Indian editors to work in an organised fashion unlike the British editors, who almost always support each other. And perhaps the lack of an ability of the Indians to work as an organised team is in itself one of the reasons they got colonised. Why blame it on the British? When people act like cattle it is only a matter of time before they are subjugated. If it weren’t for the British, the French or the Portuguese or the Dutch would have colonised India.

    The Wikipedia pages are amongst the top 2-3 search engine results whereas blogs like this show up on the 7th or 8th pages and are very less likely to be stumbled upon as compared to Wikipedia. The good thing about Wikipedia is anyone can edit.

    I also see that you use Wikipedia as a source – that’s stunning since Wikipedia itself does not allow using itself as a source.

    Comment by Rajesh — February 2, 2011 @ 2:21 pm | Reply

    • Rajesh,

      I also see that you use Wikipedia as a source – that’s stunning since Wikipedia itself does not allow using itself as a source.

      I only use Wikipedia as a source for commonly availiable things where there can be little dispute eg what Malthus theory says etc.It can be substitued for a more “peer reviewed” reference without any trouble. Same goes for the images,most of them are open domain anyway.i am not out to make money from this,so am not really concerned wether wikipedia allows quoting of its articles or not.
      I always find it amusing when our people raise inane points like the above.If Wikipedia gets in touch with me regarding the above Ill think about it,till then I am not bothered.
      For everything else where i make a point I make it a point to read and quote from source..as you have read the article it should be quite obvious to you.

      The British work together as they are taught a common narrative from their childhood regarding their history.About our education system the less said the better,hence our people fight amonsgt each other over the most minor of points.This is precisely why I avoid participating in Wiki talks and the like,only end up wasting valuable time.

      If it weren’t for the British, the French or the Portuguese or the Dutch would have colonised India.

      I suggest you read up a bit more of history before passing statements like these.Try reading historical narratives in Indic languages rather than those in english to get a truer picture.
      anyway,all the best.

      Comment by Yogeshwar Shastri — February 2, 2011 @ 2:51 pm | Reply

      • The problem with your article and your arguments is an inability to accept that India and Indians made mistakes, many of them. You are trying to blame the British for everything. Instead, it is better to look inside, accept your mistakes and try to improve because while the situation is slightly better today, we still lag behind in terms of organized teamwork. The only reason why someone else (say the Chinese) haven’t enslaved India is because of institutions built by the Western world like the UN and one of the major reasons why India is prospering today is because of institutions like the World Bank, IMF which aid globalization from which India benefits.

        BTW, apart from the Bengal famine of 1943, no other famine was man-made or British made. They could certainly have done better with relief operations but it was a different time and India was a subjugated, enslaved country. Your claims of genocide are pseudo-history.

        Comment by Rajesh — February 2, 2011 @ 3:17 pm

      • Ah yes! the real “Brown sahib” comes out,after some initial “decent” posturing the name calling begins.

        I only let your comment thru to establish precisly what kind of “delusions of history” our people suffer from.any further comments will not be entretained.

        Comment by Yogeshwar Shastri — February 2, 2011 @ 3:22 pm

      • ‘The British work together as they are taught a common narrative from their childhood regarding their history’

        You really are delusional. Schools in this country teach negatively about British empire history and have done so since the 1960’s – where do you get you information FFS? You must be the most racist person I have ever come across. Take a chill pill and calm down before your hate consumes you

        Comment by Tim — January 3, 2012 @ 5:46 pm

    • A simple fact of this post is that it stays away from the meat of the argument discussed and concentrates on mundane points – that IMO is because “Rajesh”

      1) cannot argue as he is ignorant
      2) is not Indian! Probably a Brit coward posting as “Rajesh”

      Comment by CM — January 4, 2012 @ 8:15 am | Reply

  7. “If it weren’t for the British, the French or the Portuguese or the Dutch would have colonised India.”

    Educate yourself on Indian history before spewing out nonsense like the above.

    The Portuguese were a declining power who lost Bassein to Marathas in 1739 and were praying in a charnel house (Emperor Julian’s term for a church) as the Marathas planned to advance into Goa proper under Sambhaji, they were saved by Mughal intervention which diverted Maratha attention.

    The Dutch also lacked the resources.

    Notice that this clown Rajesh never disputed any of the actual points or sources given in the article, only labelled it “psuedo history” while manufacturing his own psuedo history of how the West saved India, perfect example of a house n*gger that Malcolm X talked about.

    Wonder if he is also a convert to the religion of “love” like his fellow coolie Dinesh D’Souza.

    Comment by Julian — February 9, 2011 @ 1:47 pm | Reply

    • Julian,
      i let some of his comments thru precisely to illurstate the leaps of logic people can make.Entertainment all round.

      Comment by Yogeshwar Shastri — February 10, 2011 @ 8:26 pm | Reply

  8. Hey Yogeshwar Shastri,…As with many of the victims of British, Dutch, German, Spanish and Portuguese Imperialism and now North American Imperialism, you fail to illuminate the source of the impetus for theft and cruelty on a global scale – Bankers, yiddish khazarian Bankers, the rothschilds et al. Banks finance war:

    “If my sons did not want wars, there would be none.”
    Gutle Schnaper – 1849 (wife of Mayer Amschel Rothschild.)

    Also, this same tribe were the overwhelming money behind slavery in Africa and on the Sub-continent. So, drop the tired old racism meme of white men are to blame and your work will be liberated, unlike the people of India that you bemoan, that have continued to suffer under a disgraceful caste system (which you fail to mention manifested the infrastructure of bigotry upon which the British raj was established!) the same evil yiddish khazars that were the driving force behind the British empire is the same force behind India’s current corrupt, bigoted and bungling incestuous political regime.

    Very good Post however, just broaden your vision and your work will become essential to all who wish to understand the political and financial facilitation of greed and cruelty.


    Comment by veritas6464 — May 23, 2011 @ 9:31 pm | Reply

    • Veritas,like most outsiders you typically have no understanding of how Indian society works or worked historically.I find it quite amusing when outsiders fulminate on the “horrible caste system”.The word “caste” and its current form in Indian society is itself a Colonial British construct.I suggest reading books by the likes of Dharampal etc to gain some sort of understanding of what Indian society was like before the white “civilisers” showered their munifence on us.

      Of the yiddish connection I personally have no clue hence cant comment.

      anyway thanks for your comment.

      Comment by Yogeshwar Shastri — May 24, 2011 @ 3:33 pm | Reply

    • Veritas,

      You dont have any knowledge of indian society or its caste system , except for missionary documents.. this is far enough to remind you that your notions are pre-conceived and unjust.. the indian intellectual space has been occupied by marxists, missionaries and liberals for long time, and they had spread enough canards against caste system..

      Btw the point you raised about Rothschild is indeed very valid.. Till today, they are the owners of american federal bank, and many other big financial institutions.. and fund many wars..

      The White racism is indeed a reality, NOT because of common white people, but because of the Christian missionaries..

      Comment by senthil — May 27, 2012 @ 11:01 am | Reply

  9. Your middle-class arrogance is undermining your potential. Your are a very capable writer, my opinion remains that with some tweaking you would be an awesome force for freedom and equity. Never-mind, your probably not going to deal with your inherited insecurity issues…

    Bigotry is not the sole proprietary good of the white folks brother.



    Comment by veritas6464 — May 24, 2011 @ 11:04 pm | Reply

    • For someone with no clue about the ( foisted ) caste system, you sure carry an attitude…patronizing and all that.
      Not one feckin European historian could speak/understand Sanskrit proper for the most part of 1800/1900s .
      These guys write Indian history, spawn followers like you and we Indians have to bear these teaching us about the “caste” system!
      And of course, the standard argument : Indian history not documented – the argument of cowards and calcified brains! Seek and you shall find…and stop resorting to cliches!

      Comment by CM — January 4, 2012 @ 8:27 am | Reply

  10. Hey Yogi,..Despite yourself, I have linked you at my site and now you are going to have some really discerning people read your stuff, good luck, I think you are essential to the cause of freedom and equity!


    Comment by veritas6464 — May 27, 2011 @ 3:00 pm | Reply

  11. Oh ya sure blame the “yiddish old khazars” (code word for Jews) for Christian British colonialism!

    So if Yiddish Khazars were able to always fool you superior white people, then you probably aren’t all that superior are you dumbass?

    The driving force behind what happened was the cult known as christinsanity, yiddish khazars had nothing to do with Christian Portuguese scum torturing Hindus for refusing to become Xtians during the Goan Inquisition.

    And drop the tired old BS about “caste system”, at least Hindus weren’t selling slaves by the millions while you superior Europeans were making it into a profitable business.

    What you Christians did to the Hindu Civilization we will never forget despite your attempt to divert attention to Jews, you will experience the consequences of the scummy behavior of your worthless ancestors very soon in your own country through your resident Muslim population. May the Islamic flag flutter over Downing Street!

    You are a worthless moron like many modern Europeans cut off from your ancestral culture and imprisoned by the mind virus of christinsanity whether you realise it or not. Yiddish Khazars didn’t even exist when Christians were smashing Greek temples, genociding Greek “pagans”, banned the Olympics and attacked the Prthenon.

    Comment by Julian — May 30, 2011 @ 2:55 am | Reply

  12. […] An Explanatory note on the Famines in India (similarities to MO of Irish “famine” are there to see. templar h/t veritas) […]

    Pingback by Links 16/Jul/11 « Non Chosen News Blog — July 16, 2011 @ 12:50 pm | Reply

  13. Dear Sir. You hard work appears to have been ruined by the huge chip on your shoulder.

    Comment by Jason Tilley — July 29, 2011 @ 12:32 pm | Reply

  14. Shastri ji,
    very good.
    Julian too 🙂

    r u guys on twitter?

    Comment by x — November 20, 2011 @ 11:58 am | Reply

  15. Very good work please publish it to more places so that more people come to know about it.

    Comment by bharat — November 29, 2011 @ 5:44 am | Reply

  16. Rajesh, do you enjoy being a house nigger? Remember, no matter how much you bleach your skin, you will always be a nigger.

    Comment by Maravan — January 3, 2012 @ 11:17 pm | Reply

  17. An absolutely fantastic piece of writing! And love the comments. We need more white folks posing as “rajesh” to really get things going. And the usual reaction from ignorance: if you cannot attack the facts, attack the author.
    An excellent work on the subject is “Churchill’s Secret War” by Madhusree Mukerjee.
    Hmmm. Think I’ll cross-check her facts against wikipedia.

    Comment by Shyam — January 12, 2012 @ 9:01 pm | Reply

  18. Its nice to know that one of our bandhu Shastriji is writing true history so that many of us can learn about it. My own great grandparents had to sell their family wealth to help feed the entire town.
    I am proud of caste system as I have seen the real one. We had servants (employees) and we took care of them, their food, education, clothings plus salary. For people of God, we know that God takes care of all.These employees worked only 3 to 4 hours and on average 6 months during whole year. Now their children go to cities and work 10 to 12 hours, entire year in miserable city life of Mumbai/Delhi etc.

    I am very happy to be born in my motherland Bharat, where earth smells of spiritually. More I travel to other places, more I love my place. In spiritual sense we are far evolved people and true human being. Without acknowledging this dormant quality, any of us will be simply two legged animal like most of the people in this world.

    Shastriji you are an awesome writer. Its utter waste of time to really pay much attention to these “albinos” as I know many of them around me. They are anything but sane, it will be fare to call them creatures of insanity.

    I suggest spreading our wisdom and love towards rest of the mankind as I know we can only give others what we have be it love or hate, happiness or misery.

    Comment by vashistha — January 29, 2012 @ 5:25 am | Reply

  19. Excellent work yogeshwar.. i came across Dharampal’s books five years before, through samanvaya.com .. these were the life changing moments for me, when i read those books.. Dharampal books were completely hidden from public and due to internet its starting to show off..

    I had enough of debating with those British Supporters, who were mainly the english educated Uprooted Urban fellows.. and most of them are brahmins whom i call as Anglo-Dubashi Brahmins, to differentiate from the traditional brahmins ..

    Its time that we all start to chart an independant view of our history without resorting to acceptance from these groups.. These groups are better to be ignored, and they are already becoming minority ranters..

    Comment by senthil — May 27, 2012 @ 11:05 am | Reply

    • Dear Senthil,

      thanks for the comments.You can send me a message via my blog.

      kind regards


      Comment by Yogeshwar Shastri — May 28, 2012 @ 3:01 pm | Reply

  20. Hello,

    I am on your page , moderately for the reason that I’m engrossed in your matter evidently but as well because I’m in the
    course of figuring out English as a fourth tongue and was advised during my lecture to
    go to see boards and internet blogs to exercise writing undamaged and “strait” english.

    I was lead to your page my Rakish, whom I believe has plus commented at this place nevertheless I can’t unearth where (it does not in actual fact have a bearing nevertheless). He explained to me that you were the real “ruler” on the subject. He was correct!

    Kindly don’t be angry by this because I actually do not wish to be
    abusive in any way nonetheless I disagree with your 3rd claim (third section) and in fact,
    as far as I recognize your text, you do too a couple of lines lower!

    I desire you are not heated with me as I especially deem Every part of the rest of your text is marvelous!
    You certainly are a gifted author.

    You might have covered this elsewhere but I’m interested as to the way you came to be such a specialist? I would like to read regarding how an indivitual turns into a thriving connoisseur and a successful writer : what tribulations did you suffer in the beginning? In what manner did you crack them? What was your best article ? What are-you on the whole pleased with?

    Thanks for taking the time to put in writing inventive quality informations as it is getting increasingly more unusual nowadays.


    PS would it bother you if I connected to your site from mine as we reveal analogous affirmations in distinct languages (mine is in Korean ).

    Comment by c&c construction — July 31, 2012 @ 11:25 am | Reply

  21. Your summary is misleading. Is that on purpose? It says:

    “From 1760 CE till 1943 India was hit by terrible famines on a regular basis. More than 85 million Indians died in these famines which were in reality genocides done by the British Raj.Contrast this to the fact that there have been no famine related deaths since independence!!”

    Some notes for you to explore:

    1. Firstly 1757 was the battle of Plassey when EIC got hold of Bengal for the first time. They did not control the country then.
    2. Many famines occurred in non British controlled areas. For e.g. Chalisa Famine
    3. Between 1800 -1900, more than 120 million chinese died in famines. In the same period, around 60 million died in India.
    4. Famine codes were developed, commission was set up and massive irrigation works were done esp. in Punjab, Ganges and Andhra Pradesh.
    5. Between 1900 – 1947, no major famines. This was result of measures taken. Except 1943 one in Bengal which was a result of war, cyclone, fungus, distribution and rice import from Burma which was occupied by the Japanese.
    6. India never kept proper records of famines prior to the British rule. They recorded 15. Compare this with China – over 1800.
    7. After independence, famines did not disappear by magic. Norman Borlaug’s American green revolution solved it in the 60s. This was invented in the 50s and was tried in Punjab. One of the reasons was abundant water supply because of the irrigation canals that were built by the British. 75000 miles of them.

    It is a complex topic and many factors involved. So I suggest an analysis without a political bias. It would help understand the causes better. Enjoy your day.

    Comment by Pme — March 11, 2013 @ 3:32 pm | Reply

  22. Hello Sir

    I posted a article on this, from a friends post. I myself, I’m not any kind of expert on this topic and as such wondered if you would be interested in this discussion. Currently there is only one post below:

    “Famines in India without any British presence, responsibility or involvement:

    1022 CE
    1033 CE
    1052 CE
    1344-1345 CE
    1396-1407 CE Durga Devi famine
    1630-1632 CE Deccan famine- 2million dead
    1661-1662 CE
    1669 CE Bengal famine
    1702-1704 CE Deccan famine -2 million died
    1783-1784 CE Chalsa famine – 11 million dead
    1789-1792 CE Doji Bara famine -11million dead
    1869 CE Rajputana famine- 2million dead

    It seems no Indian records survive for some of these famines, but taking a conservative estimate of 2 million dead in each case, it seems that successive native Indian governments and rulers have been responsible for the “genocide” of at least 42 million of their own people.

    The reason there have been no famines in India since independence is thanks to Norman Borlaug’s dwarf wheat along with the invention of the aeroplane, helicopter and the parachute. None of which were available to the British Raj in 1877. Oh, and yes there has been famine in ex-British India, in 1974 1.5 million dead and the Indian government did next to nothing.

    Dear teapot, love kettle.”


    If you want to dispute these points, it would be welcomed.

    Comment by McGuire — March 17, 2013 @ 12:16 pm | Reply

  23. Great post! We will be linking to this particularly great content on our website.
    Keep up the good writing.

    Comment by Hot Man Ass Video — July 25, 2013 @ 5:40 am | Reply

  24. […] of Christian British imperialism that led to death of millions of Hindus & other heathens (https://jambudveep.wordpress.com/2011/01/08/an-explanatory-note-on-the-famines-in-india/) . It is also apparently okay for the German government to finance churches directly […]

    Pingback by Shinto in politics & its significance for Hindus | vajrin — December 3, 2013 @ 1:24 am | Reply

  25. […] despite the horrible history of Christian British imperialism that led to death of millions of Hindus & other heathens . It is also apparently okay for the German government to finance churches directly Finally we have […]

    Pingback by Shinto in politics & its significance for Hindus | Hindu Human Rights Online News Magazine — April 19, 2014 @ 6:28 pm | Reply

  26. read more

    An Explanatory note on the Famines in India | Jambudveep’s Blog

    Trackback by read more — September 20, 2014 @ 3:26 am | Reply

  27. part time jobs

    An Explanatory note on the Famines in India | Jambudveep’s Blog

    Trackback by part time jobs — June 9, 2015 @ 4:26 am | Reply

  28. B*B*

    “Severe famines killed many millions in India between 1700 and 1900. [Chronology at Wikipedia]. Nobel prize winning economist Amartya Sen’s work on endemic deprivation stems from his experiences of the Bengal famine as a child.

    The apathy and greed of Colonial rulers had a hand (directly or through inaction) in many famines. With that introduction let me pass you over to George Monbiot’s reveiw the book Late Victorian Holocausts at Guardian where he points out the amnesia that surrounds the Empire’s massacres, especially the famines in India in late 1800s.

    In his book Late Victorian Holocausts, published in 2001, Mike Davis tells the story of famines that killed between 12 and 29 million Indians. These people were, he demonstrates, murdered by British state policy. When an El Niño drought destituted the farmers of the Deccan plateau in 1876 there was a net surplus of rice and wheat in India. But the viceroy, Lord Lytton, insisted that nothing should prevent its export to England. In 1877 and 1878, at the height of the famine, grain merchants exported a record 6.4m hundredweight of wheat. As the peasants began to starve, officials were ordered “to discourage relief works in every possible way”. The Anti-Charitable Contributions Act of 1877 prohibited “at the pain of imprisonment private relief donations that potentially interfered with the market fixing of grain prices”. The only relief permitted in most districts was hard labour, from which anyone in an advanced state of starvation was turned away. In the labour camps, the workers were given less food than inmates of Buchenwald. In 1877, monthly mortality in the camps equated to an annual death rate of 94%.

    As millions died, the imperial government launched “a militarised campaign to collect the tax arrears accumulated during the drought”. The money, which ruined those who might otherwise have survived the famine, was used by Lytton to fund his war in Afghanistan. Even in places that had produced a crop surplus, the government’s export policies, like Stalin’s in Ukraine, manufactured hunger. In the north-western provinces, Oud and the Punjab, which had brought in record harvests in the preceeding three years, at least 1.25m died.

    Comment by vj — July 17, 2015 @ 9:50 am | Reply

  29. Sad poisonous bile from a clearly prejudiced waster.
    Without the British India would be sadder than it already is. Famine is not created by man, it’s a natural disaster, (just like you).
    India has been receiving UK foreign aid for years, whilst building a nuclear capability, whilst 70% of the people live on $1 a day – you’re a sad apologist for a failed nation. Go and sort your country out rather than blame history for its in-capabilities. It’s no wonder so many Indians live abroad, they know what a shambles India has become since the Brits left.

    Comment by Phil J — July 25, 2015 @ 1:51 pm | Reply

    • Am model comment from a racist British chump.Show you what their mentality is.I would be more worried about UK which is now fast heading down the drain.

      Comment by Yogeshwar Shastri — July 25, 2015 @ 9:11 pm | Reply

      • Yogeswar Shastri – You are deliberately misleading with your wildly incorrect post.

        Bengal famine occurred under British control but the British did something about it. Huge number of canals were built and famine codes were developed which are still in use today. That’s the reason there were no famines between 1900 and 1943. It occurred again in 1943 when Burma rice import was interrupted because of Japanese occupation.

        India never recorded famines properly before the British rule who recorded it meticulously. You are simply using that data to mislead people. China experienced 1500 recorded famines in the last 2000 years. India recorded just 15. Is that even possible?

        Famines continued after independence when American Green Revolution (Norman Borlaug) solved it. It was tried in Punjab because of the colonial British effort to build canals. Punjab became the bread basket of India.

        Many famines occurred in areas ruled by Indian rulers – Chalisa, Doji Bara etc. Each of them killed 11 million people. They hardly did anything.
        Bengal famine under British control killed 10 million.

        I must say I’m disappointed that someone could present data in such a wildly inaccurate manner. It seems silly at times.

        Comment by K Punting — July 26, 2015 @ 2:41 pm

      • Whoa! its raining apologists of British crimes. Two in a row over the weekend.I must be doing something right.

        “Famine continued after independence”- really? How many people died? Talk of bogus data.Like the chap who quoted data from Bangladesh.

        For a change why don’t you dispute my data instead of creating straw men? Mark my words,the day will come when the UK( OR AS IN THe NEAR FUTURE INDEPENDENT COUNTRIES OF England ,Scotland and Wales)is called to account for its crimes against humanity and if I am still alive,will burst crackers to celebrate.

        Comment by Yogeshwar Shastri — July 28, 2015 @ 2:56 am

    • Really the British did no wrong to India! They helped India to get rid of poverty, During Bengal Famine a lady about to die came for food holding a skinny child, asked for milk, the house owner offered milk, the lady tried to feed the child, the child had died long before, the hungry mother threw the child down and drank the whole glass of milk, can you imagine how did the British Govt push a mother to animality . The British sucked the blood of the poor, it’s a different thing that we Indians were fools but that does not mean that your Britishers were saints

      Comment by Rudra — May 1, 2016 @ 8:32 pm | Reply

    • Really the British did no wrong to India! They helped India to get rid of poverty, During Bengal Famine a lady about to die came for food holding a skinny child, asked for milk, the house owner offered milk, the lady tried to feed the child, the child had died long before, the hungry mother threw the child down and drank the whole glass of milk, can you imagine how did the British Govt push a mother to animality . The British sucked the blood of the poor, it’s a different thing that we Indians were fools but that does not mean that your Britishers were saints ,,,,

      Comment by Rudra — May 1, 2016 @ 8:33 pm | Reply

  30. Did you research the connection between the food exported from India during 1899 to 1902 the time of the Armed robbery in South Africa, called the “Boer War”when the British went to steal South African gold and were deliberately starving descendants of the Dutch “Afrikaans” women and children in South Africa because they could not defeat them in war.

    Comment by Charlas — July 29, 2015 @ 4:48 am | Reply

    • Hi Charlas,

      I havent researched it.But am aware that the British killed off a lot of Boers in the concentration camps.Nothing surprises me regarding British perfidy.

      Comment by Yogeshwar Shastri — July 29, 2015 @ 9:50 pm | Reply

  31. […] [۴] An Explanatory note on the Famines in India Link […]

    Pingback by قحطی‌هایی که انگلیس به سبب آن میلیون‌ها هندی را کشت+عکس و فیلم - مطبوعات امروز — March 31, 2016 @ 12:22 pm | Reply

  32. […] [۴] An Explanatory note on the Famines in India Link […]

    Pingback by میدان 72 - پایگاه حامیان مردمی دکتر احمدی نژاد — March 31, 2016 @ 3:25 pm | Reply

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.

%d bloggers like this: